The key difference between the work of a recruiter and a researcher is that the recruiter directly communicates with candidates and supports them throughout the whole employment process, and the researcher looks for suitable candidates for subsequent transfer of contacts to recruiters, heightens the interest of specialists in the position.
A recruiter, just like a researcher, searches for candidates, prepares an offer, gets in touch with the candidate. But unlike the work of a researcher, the work of a recruiter goes beyond these tasks. The recruiter's work also includes interviewing specialists and supporting candidates at all selection stages including the final one - making and accepting an offer. The researcher is responsible only for the first stage of the selection, but that is why the researcher, as a rule, helps the recruiter find significantly more suitable candidates than it's possible during an independent search.
If we are talking about soft skills, then it's important for a researcher to be able to memorize / process / evaluate information very quickly, to be mega attentive and sociable. As for hard skills, it's important for a specialist to be able to understand all search tools and use them competently for sourcing.
First of all, a researcher should have strong soft skills. The researcher must be able to write and communicate correctly, be polite and have at least basic knowledge of the tech field, understand what types of developers, programming languages, and frameworks exist. According to my experience, more in-depth "hard skills" appear after a while.
One of the difficulties of the work of a researcher is that it's a rather routine work that requires concentration and exceptional care. In addition, you need to find candidates and increase the funnel, regardless of what job opening you are working on. At the same time, this complexity makes the work of the researcher very interesting and multifarious! :)
The most difficult thing in work is perseverance. You have to sit still for a long time and look through the CVs and profiles of candidates, and if this is some kind of vacancy for which you've already looked through all the relevant specialists, you need to think about what other ways there are to find a candidate who will fit perfectly into the client's team. The work of a researcher is the kind of work that requires concentration and perseverance.
Personally, I really like writing emails, learning new things every day, and, of course, communicating with people!
I like the moment when I find a mega-cool candidate who, as a result, accepts the offer and starts working at the client's company. Absolutely everyone is happy in such stories: the company, the candidate, and me =)
I think that the most important thing is not to be afraid to start, especially if you feel that this is your profession! :)
In order to become a good researcher, it's important to be open and kind in dealing with people, but it's especially important to pay attention to your senior colleague, be able to listen and hear the advice and recommendations of more experienced professionals. It's also important to be open to new things, read a lot about the tech sphere, constantly be in trend, because this will allow you to quickly flow into the field.
What else to read